You should trust signal tree the same way you trust a front door lock that has never been broken or picked despite repeated attempts to do both.
.Just remember that police only go through the door when it’s easier than breaking a window or tearing through a wall.
There are all of these stories about signal because it is notable when someone gets around it
That there’s anything approaching secure communication on a cell-phone dominated Internet whose.operating systems are either “snobbish walled garden” or “ad agency living in the corpse of a search engine” is astonishing. In the same way that a gun safety that keeps a toddler from shooting themselves with an otherwise loaded gun is astonishing.
Pure logic does not include axioms like “you need to breathe or you don’t”, nor does logic lead from the axioms “not all beings need to breathe” and “you can’t breathe in space” to conclusions such as either “all creatures who breathe cannot survive in space” or “no beings who can survive in space are able to breathe.”
A and not-B does not lead to if-not-B-then-A.
“Logic” doesn’t generally mean what you’re trying to say here. Well written stories and fictional universes have consistent reasonable logic that only differs from our own wirh intentional changes like “magic is real” or narrative biases like “we would have told this story a different way if the hero lost.”
A better term for what comic book stories with a mish-mash of power definitions and unexplained characterization lack is consistency.
(But, as with “literally”, the inaccurate and informal usage you probably mean to decry the medium’s unrealistic conventions is probably in the dictionary already, thanks to the cryoto-Jewish space-elves of a certain fun but overrated television show)
If AI actually adds value, it should be trivial to demonstrate that value-add in a way that passes scientific rigor.
The underlying problem is that we don’t have a good way to measure code value. Software quality is most closely coporable to a weird combination of scientific paper, mechanical diagnostic, and toy instructuon. And we don’t have good ways to measure those, either.
There was apparently one study from Stanford:
Note that the headline is misleading – stanford apparently trainded an AI model to “rate code” in a way that agreed with some of their staff and then ran that on a bunch of projects. The “good at simple and new, bad at complex and old” matches my intuition, but isn’t really a stronger test than counting minutes spent in a project or dollars spent on programming with or without AI.
And all AI output is slop. It’s just that for some things slop is good enough.
~Which really should be an argument more for discarding those things than boiling oceans to generate more of them, but capitalism loves doing wasteful things~
Humans living is the whole point of civilization, though. We don’t need the LLM to pay for the techbro carbon footprint or olichsrch child abuse, so we should similarly exclude the human’s base sustensnce and survival from their budget.
You can include the human writer’s coffee, music, and writing snacks / cigarettes.
There things are both a result of the part of the American body politic that espoused an obnoxiously individualistic idea of “freedom”. Because some jerks don’t want to pay taxes or care about other people, they argue against government things that help people – like regulating food and encouraging healthy diets for those with means, or giving the hungry food or money to buy food.
There isn’t a good argument for it, just a bad-faith argument made by mean adults who don’t mind children starving or adults dying early.
It’s complicated.
As I understand it, the short form is that the same laws that keep a corporation from taking photos of you in public and using your face and name to sell their product also make it hard for a movie company to tell the story of Erin Brokovoch or Queen without their permission. Not impossible, just “hard” – so hard that it’s often cheaper to just get permission and be done with it.
Part of it is likeness rights, part of it is defamation, and part is just the threat of an expensive lawsuit.
$100k is generally not “small claims”…
In utah the limit looks like $20,000
https://www.utcourts.gov/en/self-help/case-categories/consumer/small-claims.html
There are some games tbat are sold on both steam and other platforms. Many of these games have external modding communities. Steam provides slick integration for “workshop” mods, which helps drive sales.
A few years back steam used to allow fairly open API access if you acquired the game elsewhere and just wanted the mods. And then they turned it off, but still allow direct anonymous downloads. A decision that only makes sense if they wanted to lock in any steam-adopted community to make going elsewhere difficult.
Turning off something people were using to avoid potential competitors is kinda exactly what would count as “monopolistic behavior” if Steam were to be ruled a monopoly by a court
I read it as “torrent isn’t stealing, but if it was id do it even harder because those guys suck”.
Was this written by AI? Or is there some local sit-down restaurant with waitstaff that just happens to share a name with a famous fast food chain?
LLMs are less human than monkeys, and so are not granted any copyright at all for any near-art created through them just as a human can’t claim copyright over what apes do with a camera.
The question isn’t whether or not the overgrown reddit-comment-simulator is original or not The question is if its output counts as writing and acting. And the answer to that is a strong no.
Why oh why can’t people use the right names for things?
Open Source didn’t die. NPM just proved its controls insufficiently trustworthy.
This is kin to red hat including a subscription check in their branded Linux distros and then screaming that “Linux is no longer free” just because one vendor wants to get paid.
Except, of course, that it’s even dumber that that because it’s about “enterprise IT”, where everything is either a billion dollar project or a hack put together by some salaryfolk in their spare time. (Or both, simultaneously.)
The progressive and conservative “movements” in the USA were named the same way Greenland was. By picking a word that would help appeal to low information folk.
Neither has any actual adherence to either change or tradition for the sake of such.
Wage theft as only “not paid what was owed according to current law” is already the biggest form of theft and the least prosecuted.
Please don’t help perpetuate capitalist exploitation by blurring it with the “value theft” inherent to capitalism
That’s why bsky’s pseudo-federation isn’t as big a deal as some ActivityPub boosters claim.
As I understand it, if lemmy.world shuts down or starts demanding cash my only resource would be the same as if Facebook decides I’m too critical of billionaires – start all over elsewhere with a new account. Sure, I could get close to the same experience with a different node, but I’d be a brand new account with no history. I might as well go someplace else entirely.
Bsky’s “portable user” idea fixes that. There are accounts my bsky account follows who switched to blacksky, and if they hadn’t said they’d changed I wouldn’t have noticed. The essential identity of their account shifted almost seamlessly, and they “federate” with everyone else, aside that their appview shows accounts that bsky’s ordinary moderation hides.
I don’t have any illusions about how altruistic the cryptobro VC’s are. But the entirely of their value proposition is that “leaving bsky” should be about as painless as porting your number from Verizon to AT&T.
The claimed reason for that is to highlight “referrer” links for the sites people go to from bsky.
My understanding is that if you click like https://www.themarysue.com/ the website operators would see a “feddit.org” or “lemmy.world” referer if you’re using a web browser and don’t have a defeating option enabled, but not if your browser is locked down or you use an app. The immediate redirects, however, do consistently show in the web site’s access logs.
It’s possible bsky could fuck around with this in the future, but doing so risks just sending users to a pseudo-fork like blacksky.
You’re right about the effect (lawsuits and the threat of the same are more common in America than Canada or the UK) but not at all about the cause.
The USA has had a decades-long choice to have our industry regulated primarily not through government bureaucracy but instead judicial liability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_through_litigation
breaking the encryption is hard , but getting around the encryption is entirely doable without physical access if you allow SMS or on-device sharing.