• 0 Posts
  • 529 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 22nd, 2025

help-circle


  • “Once everyone has a credit card they will ban cash so that every transaction can be tracked”

    “Once every phone has GPS they will make it mandatory to send your location to the government at all times.”

    “Once everyone has a car they will make walking illegal”

    “Once everyone has an ID they will make it mandatory to scan it on every step”

    “If you let gays get married people will marry their pets next”

    Do those thing ever come true at all? Other than US being a fascist state run by corporations, did any country managed to pull off this slippery slope type trick? From what I see people either consent to being tracked in exchange for likes on social media or governments simply push mass face renegotiation and tracking (like in UK) without any sort of “step by step, boiling frog” type bullshit.


  • Apropos “Cut of the Stone”. I read a book about history of surgery and one chapter was about a guy who remove his own bladder stone. Back then people didn’t have great hygiene and urinary track infections were common. Those would cause bladder stone that would get worse and worse witch each infection. The stone would block the urethra entrance so you would feel you like really need to pee but once you stand up you wouldn’t be able to. This wasn’t very pleasant so people would try to remove the stones. Typical way was to go through the taint, open the bladder, remove the stone. There’s a lot of blood vessels there so survival chances were not great. Doctors refused to do it because patients would die to often and then family would blame them and they had enough shit to deal with already. So you had traveling bladder stone removers. They would do the surgery and by the time patient would die they would be on the road again.

    So this one guy, a blacksmith, tried to get his stone removed twice or had two stones removed already, it’s not clear. Anyway, he didn’t like the traveling stoncutters. So he got a sharp knife, asked some guy to assist him and did the surgery himself.

















  • I was focusing more on the “hooking up conscious brain to computer” part than about the damage and infection part.

    Thought experiment: let’s say we have a dead brain patient. You have verified that there is no neural activity in the brain beyond cerebellum. There’s no consciousness in the brain. Legally it’s still considered a person. You can’t for example shoot them.

    We also have a 5kg blob of lab grown human brain tissue. We have verified there is neural activity in the entire blob but we don’t know what it’s doing and we can’t communicate with it.

    Which one is more conscious? Which one should be considered more human and should have more rights?