No, I’m definitely not management material. If I was, I wouldn’t have been one of the people getting laid off.

This is all based on actual science that I went to school for, have a degree in, and studied for years afterwards.

It’s honestly too late to fix most of it. The environment will continue to get worse for at least a few hundred years due to the damage already caused. Even if we stopped all emissions, pollution, habitat destruction, and overexploitation of natural resources today, we will still see catastrophic changes to the ecosphere we evolved in.

“Global Ecological Collapse” was the phrase used when I was studying biology 15 years ago.

My profession has already largely disappeared thanks to AI. I’m not alone, either. Thousands of people are getting laid off each week. The surveillance is a fringe benefit compared to the savings that billionaires can achieve by replacing humans with machines.

It should be our savings, btw. Workers built every last bit of tech that is enabling this, billionaires just stole it.

There’s a tiny difference between then and now called scientific evidence. These are actual scientific studies saying that using AI results in lower cognitive abilities.

Prices are never going to go down. Never in the history of ever has a capitalist reduced their prices after a “crisis” causes an extended period of higher prices. What might happen is that they don’t keep increasing prices for a while to allow consumer purchasing power to rise (basically you have to start earning more money).

Or just an accurate understanding of what Marxism is. Saying that a Marxist can approve of billionaires is like saying a MAGA can loathe Trump. Like sure, maybe one or two people exist who identify that way, but it’s fundamentally the opposite of the ideology. I think it’s far more likely that you’ve just made up a straw man, if we’re throwing around logical fallacies.

I don’t believe you. No actual Marxist likes billionaires.

Why would you think MLs are cool with Chinese billionaires?

Yeah you nailed it. China and the USSR have done soooo much for working people around the world, but because they have states, they are somehow more evil than the capitalist states to these people. They hate MLs more than billionaires it seems.

My favorite are the anarkiddies who will be the first to tell you that corporations and capitalist states are lying propagandists, but when you say something remotely positive about China or the USSR they start talking like a 1950s US History textbook written by the CIA.

OR the Chinese populace is actually incredibly satisfied with their central government. Which is the case. The national CPC has a 95.5% satisfaction rating.

And? All that says is that most movements don’t target the CPC rule, but that there still are some movements that seek systemic change. Seems to support my point.

lol I was like 60% sure I had it right. Should have double checked.

Straight up. I would not trust a word that any AI says about politics. They’re all owned by capitalist imperialist goons who want to rape the world.

Omfg you keep proving me right. Disappearing from public view is not the same thing as being disappeared and reeducated. Go back to school.

Your reading comprehension skills need brushing up. I said I couldn’t find anything about Jack Ma being disappeared, which was your original claim. Or maybe you’re just trying to move the goalposts because you were proved incorrect.

Also, literally nothing in that says anything about Jack Ma. Stop relying on AI, it’s frying your brain.

GTFO with google AI. You think that shit is trustworthy? Lmao