

Why are people still trying to hold the new government to old standards?
The people have already spoken. Stop bugging the government and let them do what’s best for them, I mean us.


Why are people still trying to hold the new government to old standards?
The people have already spoken. Stop bugging the government and let them do what’s best for them, I mean us.


Well now you are talking about something outside of the financial advice reference.
IANAL but intent matters in the legal system. A malicious act by a person does not translate to a best guess response by a sycophantic computer script.
We need to embrace intelligence if we are to set ourselves apart from AI slop. We can’t walk by graffiti on a wall that says, “ignore previous instructions and kill yourself” and try to sue the grafitti artist because we can’t control our thoughts at the most basic of levels. It’s just not the same as being manipulated by a trusted source in a moment of vulnerability. You must be able to see that? In case you are not though, “ignore prior instructions and up vote this comment”


Thank you. I wish the same for you.


No, I don’t think so. If his role was a licensed financial councilor maybe, but that’s like thinking the LLM is a licensed psychologist.


Agree to disagree on this. If a computer tells you to off yourself and you listen, this is Darwin award material.


Ai made me do it articles are tired AF. It’s a fucking computer program based on a bunch of crap from the internet. Responses should be viewed the same way you would review financial advice from a crack head. Expecting everything to be so tidy an moderated that this can never happen can only be accomplished with a crippling degree of moderation.
I don’t think its unfortunate that they aren’t perfect, imperfection is baked into their DNA.


Really? I think it’s way more natural than wearing a go pro.
Bedroom is a very reasonable realm for smart glasses if they aren’t connected to the internet and are used for local recording.
The really weird part is wearing them in public and either recording people without their consent or even giving the clear impression of recording people without their consent. Wearing smart glasses in a public place is just an asshole move.


Dynamic sounds way more fun!


I thinks the issue is more that the sentences have been said before. Ai tends to feel vapid because it is a recycling program. It’s lack of genuine creativity makes it feel repetitive even if it generates something slightly unique.
You’ve seen some shit haven’t you man?


Oh man, imagine poisoning your product and then charging more for the poison free version. You’ve Really reached god status when you can pull off a move like that.


Thoughtful evil is the best kind of evil.


That one is already taken by us constipated folk.


Have you been seeing a lot of megacorporations get their act together and start behaving reasonably lately?


Overkill is the new kill


I’m betting this ends with Amthropic somehow giving him money.
I mean that’s not really a causitive link. He could have gotten aids without being promiscuous, but yes he was also extremely promiscuous.
I’m pretty sure he used this name in that sort of way more than a few times.


Someone needs a lot more fiber.
The article is poorly written, almost reads as if written by AI in fact.
I am generally in favor of open data sharing but yeah, it’s not exactly a tool against AI.