Disagree. Go-pros are easy to hide inside objects.

The round camera holes in a thick eyeglass frame are much more obvious than a gauze covered lens.

Sure, argue for the protection of children, but at least be consistent.

Everything they can do, a go-pro or adjacent camera would work without issue and with less ambiguity.

So why aren’t we banning those for perverts too?

If you want crispy, heat with the air fryer.

If want moist and hot, use a microwave.

Don’t cook soup in the air frier or toast in the microwave.

Is an airfryer just a small fan oven?

Run away. Run away.

Yes.

Strong start, but “that was the point” adds little extra information. The subject of the point needs more exposition.

• “Unfortunately sometimes they grow too big”

• “Unfortunately Steve’s was cancerous”

• “Unfortunately they need the right food”

Etc.

That said, the quality of the submission is not for the overzealous Mod to rule on. It should certainly have been posted, at the minimum for others to critique and improve.

It comes from this paper. Using existing data on recordings and books we obtain a point estimate of around 15 years for optimal copyright term

It makes sense that some copyright protection is beneficial to society as it encourages new works.

But I think the important part is to ensure copyright is non transferable. Then large corporations cannot build (and charge for) large libraries.

Using existing data on recordings and books we obtain a point estimate of around 15 years for optimal copyright term

Edit: Who down votes an academic reference?

Could you imagine AI Cowel piloting a self replicating von Newman probe?

iTrump

15 years of non transferable copyright encourages creativity.

We are all training our own AI models now.

I think you said something but I only heard *******

I completed a 5 day no shit music festival. Next time I’ll just remember to bring paper.

Limited copyright encourages sharing. This is why patents are good. The problem occurs when the lifespan of the protection is too favourable to a non creator owner.

Protections held as an asset by a corporation do little to encourage innovation.

The niche case here is model training.

Unless there is volcanic activity, geography can be considered permanent within a lifetime. Given the accuracy this technology claims, I suspect the lifespan is very short lived.

Geography and celestial maps are permanent (mostly).

The next question is, how long until a quantum measured map becomes unrecognised? Is the half life years or hours?

Why do we expect this quantum map of gravity and magnetic fields to be permanent?