NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ

For sure, I just hate the idea of my employer spying on me constantly. I guess ones that don’t are few and far between these days.

…Have you considered finding a new job, perhaps?

Americans believing Americans are exceptional for no reason? Colour me shocked.

Holy retired gif

Be gay.

I mean, I guess you can get a list of domain names accessed, but accessible data is still quite limited imo.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d rather avoid it entirely or use a VPN if I’m on such a network if I must.

I think most of the data going to and from your phone is gonna be https, I doubt it would provide much value tbh

Oh, the Swedish Democrats party? Yeah, they’re cool with gay people existing, but think marriage certification should be allowed to be denied on a case by case basis. They also hate foreigners and trans people.

…Because the conversation was literally about Valve? Wtf are you smoking lmao

I meant by major AAA studios. I also prefaced with “in the west” AND “one of the first,” not the first. Not sure why you brought up China, despite the phrasing.

I didn’t lie, you’re just twisting my words and building a strawman argument to attack.

Why the white knighting for Valve? I actively play Valve games and even participate in buying the occasional lootboxes. That doesn’t mean they don’t profit massively off of children gambling. They’re a multibillion dollar corporation and do not need your defence.

Criticism and observations != hatred.

…they’ve been actively peddling loot box based gambling to kids for 16 years.

They’re probably one of the first western gaming companies to introduce such a mechanic, even.

Lol, I like you. Likewise, cheers mate :)

No worries. Let’s just be chill lol.

I will say, I think you joined an argument to argue something no one was talking about.

athatet@lemmy.zip said Because people are not ‘illegal’ for crossing an imaginary line on a map. to which I responded, Where did he call anyone ‘illegal’?

No one is arguing about using the word illegal, but specifically labelling people as illegal. A person cannot be in and of themselves illegal, but they can illegally migrate. That’s the discussion. athatet seems to have mentally lumped me in with a group of ideologies of which I do not belong. I actually agree with athatet here and I was trying to show that we’re on the same page on this.

You barged in here on a completely different tangent for no reason swinging in full force derailing that. Maybe you yourself call undocumented immigrants “illegal immigrants,” but that’s a whole different discussion.

Anyway, hopefully that helps clarify my position and doesn’t come off confrontational at all. Thank you for your good faith response, I actually really appreciate it.

Can I just ask you a question and maybe get an actual answer? Like, why are you here? We could have had an actual conversation, but you’re just trying to get a rise out of me for literally no reason. What’s the point?

You’ve either lost the plot or are a troll. Have a nice day.

“Illegal immigration” is the act of migrating into a country in violation of that nation’s immigration laws. It does not describe people, but an act.

On the other hand, there is no such thing as an “illegal immigrant” and no where in the article text, Bernie’s words or otherwise, was there purported here to be so. Again, please point to me where anyone (read: a person) was called “illegal.”

In summary: you should not accuse others of being unable to read when you clearly cannot do so yourself.

I’d actually be curious as to the share of resources each of these aspects of modern internet architecture use.

I’m just just Google sans AI sucks up some serious water and electricity, I just have no idea how it compares.

I really love what you’ve contributed to the conversation, “Nonconfrontational”.

“You removed, or stupid?” and “Can you not read?” are very informative, thank you for posting.

Guess I shouldn’t be too surprised by someone from lemmy.ml, though.

Literally no where in the quote or article linked was anyone called “illegal.” He referred to people as undocumented, if that’s what you mean? Can you not read?

I mean, yeah, if you’re punishing people for consuming the drugs directly, 100%. However, Trump’s focus has been more on preventing fentanyl from entering the country.

Unfortunately, he’s still an idiot since the US’s own pharmaceutical companies are the primary culprit and he’s just using Mexico as a scapegoat, so yeah, you’re not wrong lol.