Yup, blindly following. Clearly that is my way. No independent thought whatsoever.

Perhaps we should force cars out so wagon makers can have their jobs back?

Perhaps we should force out wagons and horses to bring in a new age of rickshaws?

My take is, your take is pretty simple-minded.

Holy shit, its logical fallacy over and over with you.

I didn’t make any assumptions. If they can avoid animals now (which they can, and do), they can improve that detection and/or logic for cats that have disappeared under the car and not reappeared. That’s not even an assumption, much less a “big” one.

And you’ve never hit a cat that was hiding under your car? Are you sure? How can you prove it? Have you gotten out each time you drove away to make sure there wasn’t a cat left behind?

And you’ve driven 93m miles, so you can compare your extensive history and record of driving with waymo’s?

I personally don’t like the idea of driverless cars.

And there is your bias.

No one argues self-driving cars are “needed.” The point is, they are a significant improvement over humans when developed correctly.

I have faith that if they keep making errors like this, people won’t give them business. I have faith that they will fix socially unacceptable issues in the name of money.

Kindly fuck off with your misplaced judgement.

While our vehicle was stopped to pick up passengers, a nearby cat darted under our vehicle as it was pulling away,

There are plenty of assholes who will aim for cats while driving. This, at least, can likely be remedied fleet-wide and permanently with a software fix. These people are just looking for an excuse to rail against automation— as if a human driver would have definitely seen the cat.

Also, keep cats inside.

Well, it would be perfect for someone who wants to ink plans to break out of prison I guess.

My favorite is when “data not tied to your id” is user ID, name, device ID…

They probably dorked up a bgp route or something. It was down globally.

I use LLMs for one thing only, turn my own ADHD ideas into something others can understand.

Regulatory capture decapitation

My point is the point I made up in my first post, which was to argue against the idiotic point that everyone could just use motorbikes, to which you continued to argue with. Here, in case you forgot:

People don’t even need car tbh. Motorbikes everywhere please. Zip zip, less traffic, everyone pays attention to road or falls and dies.

Let me go ahead and quote the broad spectrum claim that came before mine:

People don’t even need car tbh. Motorbikes everywhere please. Zip zip, less traffic, everyone pays attention to road or falls and dies.

You all talk a big game, but I’ve been to about 20 countries so far in my life. Distributed all over the world. They ALL have traffic led by cars. I guess I haven’t been to Mumbai…

Your assumptions are wrong, and you live in fantasy. Get over it.

No, not the answer. I don’t live in New York you clown.

Great, where you live.

Lol, come here and use our public transport options before you speak. This entire thread is led by those laying wide-reaching proclamations while being unable to consider any situation other than their own.

Motorcycle rider here. Yes, families with children will rent a truck anytime they want to purchase groceries, and when it’s raining. It’s not practical.

This is a stupid thread.

Premium but without the music. And with ads apparently.

This headline has come up a few times. Everyone seems to miss the glaringly obvious point that calling a program racist because it targets low income families is… racist.

It has too much data