Echo Dot

Can yo specifically point to some problematic content, because so far you’ve just complained

First one, then the other

The tracking is also entirely unnecessary. People walk around with GPS enabled phones in their pockets the entire time you don’t need a separate CCTV camera network. At least with GPS enabled phones the only people who can track you with the government, but the cameras have been monitored by a corporation these days people tend to trust the government more than the corps, although it is a close run thing.

I don’t like any of the US talk show comedy things, they’re all just really weird. I don’t understand this tendency to go off on a random tangent that has nothing to do with the main talking point, and then to just slam back to the main talking point once they’ve made their unfunny joke.

John Oliver does it all the time.

They just didn’t want to be left out.

“Our AI will bring about the end of the human races well guys, please pay attention to us”

I like to respond to that with posts about how many people have died of heat stroke recently and make comments about how they’re all really old. That usually gets their goat because they know climate change is real they just don’t want to admit it because that would require them to take some responsibility.

I don’t know how people do that job, I did it for week and couldn’t stand it.

Very few people all that upset about ML in general, it’s technology that’s been around a very long time and historically has not consumed 40% of global water supplies. But now it is.

If they could go back to not doing that I could go back to not being upset by it.

Colloquially it’s called the United States of America.

In order for AI to have a market there would need to be a large scale demonstration of the uses and benefits of AI in many various industries, most of which do not involve image generation or writing a single line of computer code.

I’m so sick of asking people for demonstrations of AI use and it being 100% programmers going “oh it’s really good at writing functions”, now I have no idea if it is, or isn’t, any good at writing functions, but since I don’t write functions, that example is of no use to me.

I want to know how good it is at writing technical documentation for proprietary hardware solutions that the AI will have no experience of in its training set, because I suspect it sucks at it. How good is it at taking poorly written guides in Chinese, translated into English via Klingon and ancient Babylonian, how does it handle it if it comes across the sentence “absolutely do not ever warning” with no additional information as to what I absolutely should never not do. Because that’s when thinking is involved, and AI doesn’t think.

Ship them outside the US and then someone can use them as webcams

I don’t immigration they are still fully assembled.

If I lived in the US I’d just go around in blacked out sunglasses the whole time because there’s so many things that you better not see.

Don’t even understand what this AI feature was even supposed to be for. I’m certainly not going to rely on an AI to annotate satellite imagery. This was always just a stupid marketing thing with no real purpose behind it.

For all of Google’s faults, which of course are numerous, they do have some really talented engineers working for them, and it’s just a shame that their time is constantly wasted on crap like this rather than on useful features that people would actually benefit from.

My parents have a car with remote start, and I’ve never been able to understand what the advantages are supposed to be. The only time that they’ve ever used it was when they first got it, and were playing with it.

Ah ha, my clever plan has been poor and not being able to afford to buy a brand new BMW, has paid off.

That’s the thing though. No one does buy anything from him and he’s still a trillionaire because it’s all theoretical. If he was forced to actually come up with the money he couldn’t.

Let me put on my elbow arm bands.

Oh well as long as the FCC are good with it. You know, that oeg that got Boeing to investigate themselves.

I suppose better in this case means accurate.

Unless you just need the image to be off to the side of a PowerPoint presentation and no one’s really supposed to pay any attention to it I can’t really see how I could rely on an AI to produce an output that I want.