

Just a third party observation. It looked like you were trying to make a serious point. Then the other guy disagreed, so you made a joke to imply how his point was either wrong or irrelevant or something. So then he provided the source.
So it looks like his disagreement was valid, and you’re using the “lol I was just joking bro” defense. But it doesn’t even work as a joke if you’re just being sarcastic and wrong.


Sorry if I’m getting whooshed, but Krugman is an infamous economist. He takes really big swings and is sometimes incredibly wrong.