The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMake it make sense media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square129linkfedilinkarrow-up1263arrow-down110
arrow-up1253arrow-down1imageMake it make sense media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square129linkfedilink
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSo, you think traffic here would flow better if 4 lanes were completely unused, one lane was only used for passing, and everyone else was in the remaining lane? And you could achieve this without replacing the drivers with robots?
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, more lanes result in more traffic because there’s more lanes to cut across for each exit.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThere are also more lanes for the cars to move forward in.
minus-squareILikeBoobies@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDoesn’t matter as long as your exits aren’t bleeding into the highway.
minus-squaremerc@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoOk, so you clearly don’t understand human drivers. There’s really no point in continuing this conversation.
So, you think traffic here would flow better if 4 lanes were completely unused, one lane was only used for passing, and everyone else was in the remaining lane? And you could achieve this without replacing the drivers with robots?
Yes, more lanes result in more traffic because there’s more lanes to cut across for each exit.
There are also more lanes for the cars to move forward in.
Doesn’t matter as long as your exits aren’t bleeding into the highway.
Ok, so you clearly don’t understand human drivers. There’s really no point in continuing this conversation.