• 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah ideally you put 3 seconds between you and the car in front of you. Gives a nice, springy cushion to not brake as much. Your mechanic will also be surprised how much longer your brakes last.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        If you’re in traffic (i.e. if you are part of the traffic) and you leave a 3 second gap between you and the car in front of you, another car will drive into that gap. If you back off to create another 3 second gap, it will happen again. Even worse, if you hit the brakes to create that three second gap, even if it’s very lightly, you might cause an even worse traffic jam behind you.

        I would prefer to leave a big gap to the traffic in front of me, but in many cases 3 seconds simply isn’t practical. A car merging into the lane in front of you is inherently more dangerous than a car already being in that lane. If you keep trying to maintain a 3 second gap in heavy traffic, not only do you put yourself in more danger as you keep having cars merging in front of you, you also cause more danger to the drivers behind you by constantly backing off or braking to try to maintain a gap.

        It would be absolutely wonderful if everybody believed in the 3 second rule. Traffic would flow so much more smoothly. But, apparently that isn’t human nature. And, if you keep fighting for that gap when nobody else believes in it, you can actually make things less safe for yourself and for others.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          “if you leave a 3 second gap, there will be enough space for others to safely merge into that space as they need to”

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            And after they do, there will no longer be a 3 second gap, and you’re now driving too close to the person in front of you.

            • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              You don’t have to brake and maintain a hard 3 seconds between gap. Just let off the gas a bit let it slowly restore itself. That gap is there so cars can move in and out as freely as they need.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Depends on how aggressively someone merges in front of you, and what they do once they’re in your lane. Some people will merge way too closely. Some people will merge then slow down suddenly. Sometimes you do need to brake.

                • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  If they merge in your lane and then brake, then thats on them, not you. Yes, you will have to brake, but its not you that is being the bad driver. Just create more space between you and the car in front of you again.

                  You could also look into merging into a different lane temporarily until space is restored.

                  • merc@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    It may be “on them, not you”, but if it keeps happening because of the way you’re driving, then fundamentally it’s on you.

                    The fact is, if someone drives too differently from other drivers they make things less safe for everyone. It doesn’t matter that if everyone adopted their way of driving it would be safer. It’s still the case that driving too differently endangers everyone else.

                    In some cases, leaving a 3 second gap is going to cause more dangerous conditions than it alleviates. That’s especially true if you’re really rigorous about that 3 second gap and noticeably slow down to create a new gap when someone merges in front of you.

      • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Too many people were taught, and still teach, the “two car’s length” rule. Which is awful. 2 to 3 seconds is much better and intuitive to figure out.

        You say 3, which is great, but I’d settle for 2. Most people on the highways around me leave more like 0.5; I sincerely think the vast majority of people greatly overestimate the amount of space in front of them to the next car.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Two car lengths is ridiculously close. The average car is approx. 4.5m in length. Two car lengths is 9m. The average human reaction speed to visual stimuli is approx 250 milliseconds. At 100 km/h (28 m/s) you would travel 7 metres in that time, and that’s just the time for you to notice the stimulus and react, not to choose an appropriate action. If you’re 2 car lengths behind and the car in front of you brakes hard, you’re going to hit it.

          2 seconds behind is 56 metres behind, or 12.5 car lengths. 3 seconds is 18.5 car lengths. Even 0.5 seconds is 3 car lengths. Not enough to safely react to the car in front of you doing something unexpected, but not the tailgating that 2 car lengths implies.