amniotic druid@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agoIt's actually that simple.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square164linkfedilinkarrow-up1373arrow-down139cross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
arrow-up1334arrow-down1imageIt's actually that simple.lemmy.worldamniotic druid@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square164linkfedilinkcross-posted to: lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
minus-squareLeomas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·7 days agoNo, if a person doesn’t want to do something and the other person does something anyway, that breaks consent that second.
minus-squareHrabiaVulpes@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·7 days agoYes, but what if a person decides that while they may have consented originally during the act, they benefit more from saying they have not consented later on? I’m asking about this being quite possibly a profitable endeavor.
minus-squareLeomas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoYou have a delusionaly high opinion of the courts.
minus-squareTriasha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days agoCelebrities and the Uber wealthy have to worry about this. The average person does not.
No, if a person doesn’t want to do something and the other person does something anyway, that breaks consent that second.
Yes, but what if a person decides that while they may have consented originally during the act, they benefit more from saying they have not consented later on? I’m asking about this being quite possibly a profitable endeavor.
You have a delusionaly high opinion of the courts.
Celebrities and the Uber wealthy have to worry about this. The average person does not.