So you just boil it twice what’s the big deal

“well I gotta do it now then”

You’re

Just fyi

All those people have loved ones, who are surprised that this worked for once

https://youtube.com/shorts/h9qQ1kC8xWg

Well yeah, that just requires a consensus on what is trustworthy. There are some things that are trustworthy, and you need to have some way to identify that, if you are going to protect yourself.

But that just shifts the blame to the user, who is a non expert, and we don’t really have good ways to identify safe software products. There’s stuff like CSA for physical products. It’s short-sighted to say “well if you don’t know, use nothing”, because that’s not going to happen.

I’m also in Canada. Just because I’m not using it, I’m not going to give either of these guys a pass on maybe hurting people, or even putting them at risk of harm.

Wouldn’t need so much regulation if things were just well reasoned and fit for purpose. Or if they would stop only pretending to be those.

Well on one hand sure.

On the other hand, detrimental reliance is a tort and if someone is relying on an app for a specific safety function, the app could be civilly liable if it fails it’s function in some way.

Imagine if you had this attitude about an insulin use tracker/calculator, that sometimes gave wildly wrong insulin dose numbers.

Maybe down the road, it’s decided that aiding and abetting ICE is a crime, and providing misinformation intentionally or unintentionally is a criminal act. App developer dude could be criminally liable if he knew or ought to have known he had vulnerabilities. You know, in your New Nuremberg trials that you are going to get sometime in the next decade or so.

That’s not to say the researcher is in the clear, the timeline is too tight for his end of this to be a responsible disclosure.

Without providing more details, I also discovered that his server is running outdated software with known vulnerabilities.

I was intentionally vague because I knew that his server was vulnerable at the time of writing, and I didn’t want anyone to exploit one of these vulnerabilities before he had a chance to fix it.

Also, this is not vague, profiling techniques exist, and it puts a clear target on the iceblock servers.

Some houses have al arms, get one of those

In favour of what

Plenty of capitalist companies are government owned. Canada has crown corporations, for example, that do generate profits. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_government-owned_companies

I don’t disagree with anything else you said, they are a cult it’s just not communist at all. Fascist yes

And it’s communism.

COOOOOOOOMMMUUUUUUNIIIIIIISSSSSMMMMMMMM!!!

This ain’t gonna be that buddy, this is capitalist maneuvers the whole way. Either funds will be shoveled into private pockets or the value of this will be juiced to support the extrajudicial shit that’s going on.

Yes yes, we won’t use this as an excuse to fix the broken clock

I’m glad they got strokes too

raising concerns about the country’s ability to keep pace with rapidly evolving digital technologies

You misspelled

raising concerns about the country’s ability to buy into snakeoil

First room: “It’s moments like this that make the next room bearable”

Second room: “It’s moments like this that make the next room bearable”

Calm down Urist

But Algospeak

He shows the article, from phoronix, in the video above, and talks about it