It has to be tailored to the specific hardware so I don’t think it’s a major concern for most users. It doesn’t seem like something that can be fully mitigated either, so it’s probably not worth worrying about. Side channel attacks are really cool but also kind of useless in most practical scenarios.
The only advantage of teams is that it’s bundled with other Microsoft software. It’s worse than slack in every way. It’s a textbook example of a monopoly.
This is the most reddit post imaginable
Wrong, that would be the dental hygienist. Dentists rarely perform standard cleanings as pictured.
Also, if a cleaning is causing serious pain that’s partially on you for doing a poor job in your own routine.
To be fair anything short of selling chrome or breaking up the company would have a positive reaction. The possibility of losing chrome was priced in.
The depiction of Hades as evil is my biggest pet peeve with that series. In most of the myths Hades is chaotic neutral at worst. I know this is a common mischaracterization because of the association with death but I’d expect better from a series that pulls so much directly from the myths.
They’ve been saying this for the last 2 years
Non-healing consumables are always either so strong they’re required to finish the game (Terraria) or so weak that they may as well be a placebo (Cyberpunk).
They get a new feature to boast about
“Free market” fans when free market
The speed of many machine learning models is bound by the speed of the memory they’re loaded on so that’s probably the biggest one.
Exchange has always been done with IOUs. Even when bartering was the meta they still exchanged promissory notes for larger scale transactions where they didn’t have the goods on hand.
More likely trained to remove all artist credits.
They’ll sell each of them off to be run into the ground by some other billionaires. Both are heavily subsidized by Google’s ad business which is still somewhat unobtrusive up front. As much as Google’s services have degraded, it will be much worse with another company at the helm trying to squeeze as much value out of their investment as possible.
This will be the subprime mortgage crisis of the 2020s.
In their human choice benchmarks it was only chosen 59% of the time compared to 4o. That’s a 15-20x cost increase for 9% difference.
Poor moderator probably had a foot fetish
This would also effectively ban the use of any research produced by a Chinese national. Any papers which cite the work of Chinese labs (most of them) would be illegal, as this could be interpreted as aiding Chinese AI research.
The llama-1 paper acknowledged the use of the books dataset, libgen isn’t mentioned in any of the papers so this is new info.
“Luddite” as a diminutive persisting to the modern day is a testimate to the power of corporate propaganda, even 200 years ago.