

Grades as a judgement metric is outdated as fuck and no one wants to admit it. The goal should be to learn, not be judged. If you get something wrong, you should be able to correct it until you understand it. Passing a class should be connected to learning the material, not memorizing for a few tests coreectly.
Well I draw it as a pentagram instead whenever possible, but I think I still start at 4 if you flip it.
And go moldy the instant you take them home from the store. No sooner, no later.
Guide suggestion?
Ah superman! Dodging out of the way of 'poon like any upstanding moral young man should! ting
Nah just yelling at overworked engineers to make the propaganda more consistent who are scared of getting their visas revoked. That’s “working on it” to losers like musk
“Stomach is thriving”
They don’t even try to form coherent thoughts anymore, just buzzwords to sell your current “brand”.
Nah the tank is modified, can’t you see the hole?
I just carried a section of one of the right side tracks yesterday. It was a part of the San Fancisco Cable Car Chinatown line at one point. So fuckin heavy.
I think its a bot. Been seeing more posts that look like llms trying to comment but failing
Not for messages that are supposed to be private lol. Let me just make a copy of all texts you’ve sent over the last decade, for “archiving”.
You said Capitalism twice. This is the inevitable and predicted outcome
Yeah sometimes I get frustrated because I wish “the left” could be adults for five minutes and deal with the issues at hand. Like I don’t care about the socialist alphabet soup if you’re from PSL, or DSA, or ISA or whatever, we all agree that people are being kidnapped by I.C.E. is evil and alarming, can we just deal with this right now? We can get back to bickering about philosophy later.
But even that is complicated since there are disagreements that can’t be ignored, like whether to work with democrats, who time and time again undermine and cripple movements whenever able and divert them for fundraising.
Google is so fuckin greedy lmao
Its a bit of a complex topic, but in basic terms reactionary thinking is kneejerk reaction, what “feels right” without broader analysis. The popular surface level, like how people complain about trans people in sports cause it “feels unfair”, but when you look at the actual numbers there such a small section of out trans people in general, and even then they do pretty regular on average. Or how you here how believe all women will somehow make it “dangerous” for men dating, when in reality false accusations form less than one percent of cases, but one in four women experience assault. Whereas dialectical thinking is the thought that larger processes and symptoms influence outcomes, and one should take a step back and analyse the context and direct facts about something through critical thinking before coming to a conclusion. Like how study after study have proven that the number one factor contributing to a person engaging in violent crime is poverty, not just a person being born bad. Or how despite the narrative, immigrants commit crime at a lower percentage on average than natural born citizens. But since dialecticalism is a much bigger analysis and uses a fair amount of hypothetical and philosophical thinking you end up getting a fair amount of groups believing that their hypothetical analysis is best, such as you get with different philosophers.
To me it sounds like you’re starting to broach on the concept of reactionary vs dialectical analysis