I like women, hence, I’m hetero. Shouldn’t be too hard.
Now, you can make categories of dick lovers and vagina appreciators, but “hetero”, just as “homo” and the rest, refers to gender attraction, not genitals. No need to gatekeep that.
I have no objection being called queer, but definitionally I’m just not.
Interestingly, it’s not about the look of genitalia specifically.
For example, I happen to be a hetero person, yet I appreciate both genitals equally. What matters is how feminine the carrier is. I’ll appreciate a nice dick on a beautiful woman, but on a man…ew. Same with vaginas - if it belongs to a woman, it can be very arousing, but you won’t find trans men in my bedroom.
It’s the same genitals, but their perception is wildly different.
Red are part of the reason they are in Argentina
As AI-skeptical as I often am, is this really problematic? AI taking notes and then sharing them at the end of the meeting, for example, is objectively good.
No idea, didn’t spot any.
do NOT follow the link
I repeat, do NOT follow the link
Fair enough. But then again, we went way too far from the meme :)
Plenty of people could make at least small amounts of electricity given respective resources, if they remember anything from school.
E=mc2 will require a bit more involvement. But it can be worked out.
Not if you’re a priest. This is the caveat plenty of people used to move science through the roughest of times.
Exactly. Then you’ll have all the resources and funding you would need.
Sure enough, that would help to make it much better and more reliable, but overall, this is really all you need. Centrifuge that thing, try not to die, and you’ll have a basic nuclear fuel.
Now, to make a good nuclear fuel in large quantity, let alone make weapon-grade uranium most folks are actually concerned about, you need a much better machinery, and this is what three-letter agencies are on the lookout for.
To put into perspective how easy it is to start a “just to make a point” nuclear fission if you have uranium available: there are signs that some natural uranium deposits effectively served as nuclear reactors, generating up to 100kW of heat.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor
Fair, forgot a bit of context. Then you already have steam-powered machines all over the place, these will suffice!
Can use these, but they may be harder to come across, and don’t have too strong magnetic properties. You’ll need something better if you want to make a decent generator.
Will do for a compass, though.
I think showing just a few simple tricks that you can do yourself would advance you quite high in ancient academia, and then you’ll have some patient helping hands.
Gears + a lot of slaves = there you go.
Cruel, but you gotta use what you have to make it all work.
Sure would. But once you can have that, you can build better energy generators and more powerful machines.
True
But no one said it would be easy. We have all this machinery refined over the centuries for a reason, but doing rough models first would help jumpstart entire industries that would help recreate the rest much faster and without jumping through the hoops.
You can cast a basic draw plate with regular forms. It won’t be good, and the wires made with it will be terrible by any modern standards, they will also break more easily, but it will get the job done.
Then you heat up fine copper or silver (both can be obtained since ancient times), roll it to a thin wire-like structure, heat it up again and put it through the draw plate. Yay, you got a wire!
Got galvanic power source? Wrap the coil around a piece of iron/cobalt/nickel and blast power at that stuff. After a while, you’ll get a magnet.
Something like 30 years ago analogue clocks seemed to be dominant. Does that mean you lived through childhood and adolescence without reading time?