

Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.


Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.
I block people if they needlesly use a brand name isntead of saying the group name. Do I probably have some false positives? Probably.


It is, did I write something wrong which negates that?


How can you know a game is LGBTQ+ if they don’t talk about sex/gender? They look like normal humans to me, which differ in sexual preferences only? Example: How can you say this guy is gay without knowing his sexual preferences?


What if content amount is the problem and old search algorithms simply do not scale well? (Pagerank algorithm has bunch of assumptions, are they still true/good enough?)
We gave up “all-flat-terrain”, carbon neutral, semi-self driving things and got “this road is not paved so I’ll shake you so much that your baby will die”, “created new jobs: climate disaster control”, “just currently getting some self-driving capabilities”.
I’m half-joking of course, cars are great for long distance travel but you could argue humanity would be far better (apart from GDP) if we have no roads in the cities.
Maybe being sentient is about saying no all the time: You are a sack of water made out of carbon and it always wants to simply fall but you have keep saying “no, we stand”, “no, we tilt slightly forward” (walk) etc.
At night, when there’s nothing to do and you’ve already lost your battle against gravity (a comfy bed), maybe the helpful naysayer starts generating bullshit?


going to a website (not tech savvy enough for this) vs going to the settings on an app and select a new icon (yay anyone can do it)


Customarily, when doing these kind of calculations we ignore stuff which keep us alive because these things are needed regardless of economic contributions, since you know people are people and not tools.
I don’t miss the price haha, I miss its implications: If you were outside, you were outside; and there was no email which could hopefully find you well.
24/7 connectivity was a mistake. I miss that brief window when we had cheap supercomputers in our pockets, but data was still expensive.
1/e is about 37%, maybe 1-1/e?


Saying no is communication, and even that is too much sometimes man


You went back to the banking industry and you report this event as a good thing?


I fucking hate this. Let me zoom, stop reacting and centering omfg.
I feel like unless you can make everything yourself, logistics would be a problem:
-Bring me Potassium Nitrate