True

In German the word for it is schnaufen

Do you mean LLMs can find new bug classes or new bugs?

Die einfachste Erklärung ist, dass Google damit Marktmacht (Stichwort moat) ausüben kann. Der gleiche Grund für die jetzt kommenden Änderungen an Android.

Die Prämisse, dass remote attestation Betrug verhindert halte ich nicht für ausreichend bewiesen.

Klingt nach whataboutism? Was hat die Gebühr mit der Tatsache der Softwareüberprüfung zu tun?

Was für 2 Prozent?

Remote attestation ist Mist.

Regulated by whom? You can’t really stop someone from making tensors and scraping the web. The only good way I could see it happen would be the US enforcing it’s embargo powers, but that cat is out of the bag. I don’t see how countries like China would accept it and I also do not foresee the US trying the entire rest of the world to agree to a trade embargo with China either. Especially nowadays where the US showed multiple times that they are an unreliable partner. Even open local models are strong enough to probably scrape stuff on their own.

The funny thing to me is that Lemmy users seem to be so staunchly against LLMs, that they are unable to even acknowledge the small things it truly is good for as a tool. It’s like the opposite of hackernews on here.

Lemmy would need to be less niche and discoverability of subs needs to be better I’d say. Otherwise it’s fine already.

Splitting gas diesel and hybrids is misleading in this stat. Once EV beats all of the above, true progress is on the horizon.

Of course not. But saying an entire framework is bad is silly. That is my entire point. Thanks for agreeing with me.

Native what? AoT compiled dotnet code? Bad C++ code?

Ich fand die im Ausland doof. Auf einmal musste man als Mann auch warten. Aber alle Frauen fanden es total toll. 😂

Compares to what? Electron apps or ffmpeg level of assembler?

Or the other way around. As soon as enough people switch, game devs will follow.

It’s probably Microsofts best product