The problem is that an AI built to maximize paperclips might conclude that converting the planet to paperclips is an acceptable cost of maximizing paperclip production. It might understand why humans think it’s bad to convert the planet, but disagree. It would need to be explicitly programmed to prioritize human life over paperclips.

otherwise we would just switch it off

If it were super-intelligent, it could probably trick us into leaving it turned on.

What, am I meeting the Pope or something?

A paperclip maximizer driven by self-preservation? What could possiblie go wrong?

Are there examples of censorship or prior restraint you’d like to highlight?

What, no avocado toast?

So… it’s an order, then?

Bill Nyehilism is for me.

I’m painting a cave wall right now.

It’s George Lucas and Steven Spielberg violating Indiana Jones.

Yeah, I worked in a few affordable housing sites and the OP looks like something the on-site social workers cooked up.

You shouldn’t help old ladies cross the street anyway

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JESczegwk0g

The trick is to bounce both legs but in opposite directions. When one is going up the other is going down, cancelling each other out.

Try HTTrack: https://www.httrack.com/

How did you post a empty comment?

You fart continuously while using it.

The hands are too big.

How many assholes have we got on this planet anyhow?

The overwhelming majority of the people guillotined during the French revolution were innocent commoners.