you deleted your comment saying “you’re saying exactly what i am saying with different words”

I want you to think about it like this. Some folk don’t throw out their old stuff even if they could afford a new one. It’s called “not being wasteful”.

How your comment reads to the rest of us:

"Wrong reason people don’t like twitter - bad

Wrong reason people like lemmy - good

You both sound the same to me"

Eh? What’s this bold assumption that people would like this “feature” if fedora introduced it?

Here’s why:

Boards of directors are CEOs of other companies that are buddies of the CEO of the company they are directors of. This is like a shitty musical chair of board of directors.

It’s not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?

Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.

Because that’s usually the cheapest part that manufacturers can get away with cheapening iut further.

Not the parent comment, but we should be aware and shouldn’t be naive.

When it does snap usually the steel and concrete remain intact. It’s the stem of the bridge that’s most vulnerable to shear or buckling forces… at least that’s how my stuff fail.