terrorism is a crime. you use police to deal with crimes. investigate, get a warrant, and bring them to a judge.

i love the thumbnail

it’s in the article. more than 5000 messages to gmail users per day without dkim

can we poison this data?

Why do you think that journalists don’t deserve to get paid?

they didn’t say that. you’re making a leap of logic and putting words in their mouth

you just need to time it and work it on the talk page. I’m sure that you can get this article fixed.

if the source says preemptive, that’s going to be a hard sell. Go find another source and bring it up on the talk page.

isn’t it accurate to say it’s preemptive? you could say unprovoked, but I don’t think that’s strictly true. I think preemptive is the best way to frame it: it shows that they struck first and leaves it open as to whether anybody would have struck them at all.

you can edit Wikipedia too. The bureaucracy can be a little bit frustrating and daunting, but you can certainly keep the record accurate.

even a source which is generally reliable can have its reliability questioned in any context. and a source that is generally unreliable for some reason or another can be considered reliable in some context.