Reacting extremely violently to public fuck ups is not the same as a robust safety culture and inspection process.

No you’re right, nobody has precious photos or videos on their phone 🙄

“Research it on my own”? By doing what? Running clinical trials? We have experts as a society for a reason.

You’re probably the kind of person who thinks it’s a massive government overreach that you’re forced to wear a seatbelt.

“Hey guys, I think vaccines cause autism but THE LEFT won’t let me spread my bullshit online!

Isn’t that the same thing as platforming actual Nazis???”

Maybe a family member? He’s old enough to see a grandparent have the quality of their last days stolen.

Oh you mean like the guy he was replying to?

The facts: An IBM subsidiary removes a reference to work done from its website.

Your take: A BRAZEN ASSAULT AGAINST ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE

Yeah he’s not asking that question in good faith.

Well he owns the board, and you’ll note that they aren’t talking about removing him for this.

It’s clear that they are instead communicating a threat from Elon, where he’ll tank the company further if we don’t pay him off!

How is this a relevant question? Nobody said anything about some governing body. There have been discussions on many instances about whether to federate with them or not, and it’s accurate to say that some people think we should.

What they’re actually doing is super shady, and reason enough to cause concern without exaggerating.

Agreed, but the article title implies that they are in fact currently revealing names, which is just not the case.

I swear some people are just contrary.

It seems as though nobody in this thread actually read the article. They are not revealing user names on the site. The objection here is having the real name as part of your private profile data, in case of a future data breach. It’s a real concern, but orders of magnitude less serious than what everybody is assuming.

Shame on Ars for the misleading clickbait headline.

No need to be so defensive, champ.

Because your source of info is places you’ve lived at personally, and I assume a delivery driver would have seen a wider range of apartments than you. So without additional context, you seem to be making assumptions that most places would be like the ones you’ve seen, and “correcting” someone based on that assumption.

I’m not the delivery driver you replied to. I just thought it was dismissive to reply to a person saying “it’s difficult to figure out apt numbers” with a long explanation on why they’re wrong and how it’s actually easy.

What specifically about my post makes you think I’m angry? And defensive doesn’t even make sense as we haven’t spoken before. Maybe take a deep breath yeah?

You really think you’ve lived in enough apartment complexes to know better than a delivery driver?

Who is that car even for?! I had the misfortune of getting one as a rental once, and it barely had a 200 mile range in the tank, had basically zero room for luggage or anything in the trunk, 5 adults probably wouldn’t even fit, and it didn’t feel that great to drive. And that’s all before mentioning how ugly it is!