They expectedly don’t serve to barbarians.

But older people still trust surveys. So no, we’re doomed.

Hmm, yes. I just thought about outside usage, somehow haven’t thought about it as an inner LLM maintenance tool.

But it doesn’t work. It looks like only the owner of the text generator is able to check if some text is written with this concrete generator (with some probability). I see no use of this technique.

Wouldn’t it be more rational to drop that religion concept altogether?

It isn’t, actually. Those “essays” have questionable pedagogical results and now they will become an even bigger hassle for students.

Oh, that’s nitpicking. Study chemistry or biology. Those have much things to memorize where logic wouldn’t help you much.

People do too. And history is ALL about fairy tales.

Time changes. Cultures, laws… Absolutely all that changes. Data, that history gathers, can’t be used for prediction. At least the precision won’t be better than if you will just analyze your current situation. Absurd is trying to predict the future from fairy tails about kings and dragons.

That’s the question I can’t answer. Really, I can’t formulate a really nice definition of usefulness. But still I can’t think of any use for history. Except maybe fun as in “literature”. But being fun doesn’t justify its teaching at school. Drinking alcohol is fun too, but…

There are many other actually useful studies for that. Math excels in that.

That’s strange logic. I just want people to analyze the current situation with modern tools, not referring to some ancient legends.

They are useless. History is useless by definition; and philosophy has reached the peak of its usefulness somewhere in the middle of the XIX century and can’t do better anymore. Like alchemy, which was useful at some point.

That happens with classes like history or philosophy, the ones that are considered to be mostly useless blablabla.

Vatican Programmer: Oh, mighty Lord, sitting in the Sky, show me the way to this bug I seek and eliminate ineffectiveness. Amen.

Trump: A golden science of deals. Lesson 1. You pay me and I won’t hurt you much…

“Pirating” isn’t stealing regardless of anything. It is unsanctioned copying.

Authors will receive next to nothing too :) Only publishers.

0.01 > 0.001. Is 0.01 “pretty good”, considering you can have 1.0 but it involves some work?

P.S. In my culture we have a proverb “He never ate anything sweeter than carrots”. The meaning is self-explanatory I hope…

I’m not American, I do not eat “cereals”. I eat Internet sofa-moralists who whine all day and never did anything good for society.