cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前TikTok is offline in the U.S. after Supreme Court upholds banwww.npr.orgexternal-linkmessage-square250linkfedilinkarrow-up1667arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1649arrow-down1external-linkTikTok is offline in the U.S. after Supreme Court upholds banwww.npr.orgcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square250linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaredx1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 年前 If that were true then they wouldn’t have given ByteDance the option to sell 80% to citizens and continue operating. Except the entire point of that is the U.S. ownership would succumb to that pressure.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前*U.S. Citizen Ownership Because yeah, Chinese Military ownership is problematic for an app used by US Citizens.
minus-squaredx1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 年前Oh, now it’s owned by the Chinese military? Which part of “freedom of speech” involves precluding us from ingesting content from a country our government decided it doesn’t like? Or electing to send our own device data or interactions to that country?
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worlddeleted by creatorlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 年前It was always owned by Chinese Military.
Except the entire point of that is the U.S. ownership would succumb to that pressure.
*U.S. Citizen Ownership
Because yeah, Chinese Military ownership is problematic for an app used by US Citizens.
Oh, now it’s owned by the Chinese military?
Which part of “freedom of speech” involves precluding us from ingesting content from a country our government decided it doesn’t like? Or electing to send our own device data or interactions to that country?
It was always owned by Chinese Military.
Sure, if you say so.