• Artisian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Could someone dive into the actual study and report on what a “Corporate troll” is defined as? Also, I note this is mostly citing user self reports… Do we really think that’s a good source?

    • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have no idea either, must be those people on there who constantly portray corporations in a positive light and attack anyone who criticises them.

      • Artisian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It feels like the headline reinforces my first urge, so feeling a bit on guard.

        I’m not sure how you operationalize (or falsify) ‘15% of people interacted with folks who they think like companies’.

    • Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Where is it citing user self reports? The linked study is a collection of opinions of selected experts. It’s a qualitative study on expert’s opinions not a quantitave one that is based on reddit content or user polls.

      • Artisian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Please do correct me if I’m reading poorly; but the first subheaded section in the article doesn’t claim to be quoting a summary of experts, it is quoting a pew poll of 2.5k typical americans and whether they see ‘corporate trolls’ on reddit. If you click through the pew link, I see that Pew has a much longer article of expert opinions on this, with the topics covering many social media sites and phenomena. That includes a survey of 1.3k experts, but it is also weird: 42% claim online climate wont change substantially in the next decade?

        • Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes, the linked study does not substantiate any of the percentage claims made in the article but instead apears to be only related to the article by way of being about trolls. Since the link to the study is in a place where I would expect the link to the study that actually backs the article to be, I think either the author inserted the wrong link by mistake or, which I believe to be more likely since I couldn’t find a study that could have been the source of the article in the mentioned journal from that year, the entire article is AI generated and at least partialy made up. The article does not contain the word ‘reddit’ nor does it contain pictures so even of the experts interviewed, none mention reddit.

          • Artisian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Oh wow that’s very bad.

            Thank you for trying to hunt down the poll. I appreciate it.

            • Yareckt@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yeah. It’s teaching how, of the 150 comments that this post had only about three were saying that the study didn’t exist. All the others just trusted the medium article blindly.

              • Artisian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Your comment made me start looking through the other clearly ‘misinfo’ posts I’ve seen so far. All posted by the OP here. I’m gonna block him.