Believe? Idiot. I am irreligious. You are sanctimoniously being EXACTLY what you are attacking, MAGA.
Should we coin the term Atheist Nationalist, or maybe Hard-Physicalist Nationalist, or maybe Agnostic Nationalist Front. Maybe Nationalist Atheistic Materialistic Front.
Splitters.
Or just read the damn book before opening your mouth.
Sorry, I could have been kinder in the way I am explaining you are literally exactly what you hate.
Nope. How can we even be objective on a subjective topic?
You, dude, are objectively wrong on the use of objective.
Objects you can experience, usually you can touch them. Physics, where we derive the subjective concept of “physicality” hinges on its objective conclusions.
This is an abstract discussion over a SUBJECT, which holds no mass and only takes up time but not space.
So you think I am subjectively wrong but you wanted to not speak monosyllabically in hopes you would read more intelligent than me.
Dude, I don’t give a damn. Have a great day and enjoy the weather while we got it. Internet warrior.
What a worthless world view you have. You just had to write all of that to justify holding onto your ego, when it is so easy to let go.
Sorry that the rest of us don’t blindly believe in your bronze age fantasy book, but some of you lot tend to make it our problem from time to time…
Believe? Idiot. I am irreligious. You are sanctimoniously being EXACTLY what you are attacking, MAGA.
Should we coin the term Atheist Nationalist, or maybe Hard-Physicalist Nationalist, or maybe Agnostic Nationalist Front. Maybe Nationalist Atheistic Materialistic Front.
Splitters.
Or just read the damn book before opening your mouth.
Sorry, I could have been kinder in the way I am explaining you are literally exactly what you hate.
Why do you even hate? Must be a sad time.
Are you okay?
Odd… this is what I might ask my leg.
Btw… you apparently didn’t watch Monty Python.
Only the Holy Grail. Guess this one’s gone over my head.
Oh, dude, Life of Brian. Must see. Relevant to the discussion and hilarious.
Loll
objectively wrong in every case. Violence against oppressors does not violate the tolerance paradox.
Nope. How can we even be objective on a subjective topic?
You, dude, are objectively wrong on the use of objective.
Objects you can experience, usually you can touch them. Physics, where we derive the subjective concept of “physicality” hinges on its objective conclusions.
This is an abstract discussion over a SUBJECT, which holds no mass and only takes up time but not space.
So you think I am subjectively wrong but you wanted to not speak monosyllabically in hopes you would read more intelligent than me.
Dude, I don’t give a damn. Have a great day and enjoy the weather while we got it. Internet warrior.
Are you intending to reply to OP? “Write all that”? It’s a sentence
You are missing what I just said. So it goes.
It’s a meme you dip
Do what? Holy hell, so you not know what memetics are, you dip?