That requires you to buy all your music though, for those (like me) that own basically nothing, it’s crazy to change.
They need to force the free streaming of owned tracks or something. Qobuz allows this I think, but only if you buy through them.
There are plenty of profitable companies with lower PE ratios.
There should be age walls for some stuff. What that stuff is and how the walls work is up for debate.
In this situation (a store) using a payment method as the age wall works well. In other use cases it would not be as good.
If you could pass an age wall with no privacy loss, then most people wouldn’t have a problem with it (other than mild annoyance)
IMO: the new law is overreaching, they needed to set up privacy protecting ID verification system first if they were going to go that far. It’s an own goal so far…
Ironically, this means that they are more likely to be used to pay for porn games though…
What are you trusting them with? Most people have already given steam this information.
It’s not asking for an ID?
Screenshot is from here
It’s the best option I can think of, no privacy invasive stuff etc. My only concerns are:
A) if it’s good enough for the government
B) That it requires you to have a credit card.
The idea is that while it punishes the citizens of the country doing the tariffs, it makes their local industry more competitive in the country. This can be used fairly or unfairly.
Take steel for example. Most countries consider it a strategic resource, the want/need to be producing it to guarantee a supply in case of war, supply issues etc. Another country might be able to sell it cheaper, but you want to ensure your country still produces it; put a tariff on it, so foreign steel costs as much as the local stuff, keeping them in business.
Europe put a tariff on Chinese cars, because China was subsidising their companies so they could flood Europe with unfairly cheap cars. (Although local companies dropped the ball too)
Trumps tariffs won’t work as no one trusts that they will remain - he changes them on a whim, so no one can build out manufacturing to take advantage of them.
I assume because the most expensive plan is what all the power users have?
From the dot graph, it implies that las Vegas is one of the worse options? And Birmingham is somehow best?
Not sure I’m reading that right?
Is this a US only thing? I have no email and no Gemini app (although there are settings in system)
They pack them in as tight as they can, so doing that fucks up two stations instead…
These work well. I have to power mine through the cigarette lighter, but newer cars should have USB power as standard.
That’s really annoying for everyone else though.
You can configure that I think? (The every keystroke, not the stupidity)
I have to admit I didn’t read it through properly, but if it’s a problem with two CPUs then it’s probably a motherboard issue. (Or something g completely unrelated like ram)
Just RMA it (or the motherboard?)
Because then you have an expensive robot not being used, while still keeping the wage bill.
I think the idea is that there are other events with similar risk profiles, the papal election is just an example of one.
It’s the fabs that the us gov cares about though. You could end up with ex intel fabs producing AMD chips, with intel bankrupt. (Amd would buy them to save the cross licensing)