You mean the other reply you gave me where you either misquoted it or you misunderstood the study? And you artificially limited the scope to a single kind of hurt which wouldn’t even capture the kind of hurt we’re discussing here?
Actually I tried to find the study that you’re talking about and I can’t find it. Did he actually do a study on this? Afaict he is just a self-help author. I cant even find any formal education related to the subject.

Meanwhile if you do a quick search for if unresolved trauma leads to violence, you see a ton of research supporting that.

50/50 is a HUGE correlation.
Incidence of DV is way less than 50/50 in the general population.

Besides, it’s not just DV or SA, it’s also smaller things. You can hurt people without rising to the level of assault.

He cums in Gauss. He cums in Gauss

But this situation doesn’t 😏

Hey, we’ve got an edgelord over here. Hey everyone, look at the edgelord! He’s edging!

I figured, I was being silly 😛

If you lived through 2006 then you’re too old to enjoy having a couple of highschool goths fawn over you 🚔👮‍♂️🫵

“Hurt people hurt people” is a common saying for a reason; dealing with trauma is difficult and not dealing with it often leads to problems.
That’s not to say that victims always become victimizers, it’s to say that the cycle of violence often begins with violence.

Because girls have cooties. Didn’t you know this???

To be fair, it was made by a single dude. Not even a small indie studio, just one guy.

It doesn’t make it more fun, but it makes it more impressive and deserving of slack.

Ah yes, dick dick, my favorite movie

Banana

As much as I want it to run tall wise, there is clear evolutionary pressure to run longwise so the dog doesn’t fall out of the bun.
There is no way the hotdog could evolve sanding upright

Grapius

1984 got the characters and the setting, but not the plot. WTF weirding modules?!?!

2000 got the plot, but not the characters or setting. Why is Paul a spoiled little crybaby? Why is Mortal Kombat happening in a desert temple?

I prefer the 1984 because although it absolutely demolished the plot, between the acting, set designs, costume, and directing, it still salvaged an entertaining movie.
2000 miniseries just had me screaming at the characters in between scoffing at the atrocious costumes and direction.

I don’t think that that equivalence matters here, or that they don’t care that they’re being hypocritical.

We can still enjoy a meme about how they are hypocrites and how their stated beliefs crumble under the smallest pressure.

Switch is good if you only need to compare equals when selecting a value.
Although some languages make it way more powerful, like python match.
but I generally dislike python despite of this, and I generally dislike switch because the syntax and formatting is just too unlike the rest of the languages.

Generally I prefer the clear brevity of:

var foo=
    x>100 ? bar :
    x>50 ? baz :
    x>10 ? qux :
    quux;

Over

var foo;
if(x>100) {
    foo=bar;
} else if(x>50) {
    foo=baz;
} else if(x>10) {
    foo=qux;
} else {
    foo=quux;
}

Which doesn’t really get any better if you remove the optional (but recommended) braces.
Heck, I even prefer ternary over some variations of switch for equals conditionals, like the one in Java:

var foo;
switch(x) {
case 100:
    foo=bar;
    break;
case 50:
    foo=baz;
    break;
case 10:
    foo=qux;
    break;
default:
    foo=quux;
}

But some languages do switch better than others (like python as previously mentioned), so there are certainly cases where that’d probably be preferable even to me.

Hey, when you gotta pick a value from a bunch of options, it’s either if/elseif/else, ternary, switch/case, or a map/dict.

Ternary generally has the easiest to read format of the options, unless you put it all on one line like a crazy person.

Bah

Ternary is just a compressed if-elseif-else chain with a guaranteed assignment.
If you format it like a sane person, or like you would an if/else chain, then it’s way easier to read than if/else chains.