• Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Jokes aside, as an American, I wish the US had lost the revolutionary war. Commonwealth territories ended up with socialized healthcare, a far better democracy, and far better labor rights, while the US ended up with fascist oligarchy. No thanks. I’d gladly trade my coffee for tea if it means I get a real democracy instead of a fascist oligarchy

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Tbf some of those former territories aren’t in very good socioeconomic shape. If we’d ended up like Canada that would have been winning the lottery, but plenty of those other former colonies have plenty of problems like classist India.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Africa (and the various tribes and countries) has been fucked over by various European countries for centuries. Can’t lay this one solely on the English.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            hey, you broke it, you bought it. Now, maybe they should be doing something to fix this whole problem in the ex-British Mandate of Palestine they cause

            UK man arrested for wearing plasticine t shirt

            … Maybe not

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        To be blunt, I can’t think of a better reason to go to war than to eliminate slavers and those that would regard an entire race of people as not worthy of respect.

        The only other good reason for war is for defense. To protect yourself and your countrymen from a hostile force, but I digress.

        That shit should have never been allowed. But here we are.

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because they were ahead on industry and slavery was less profitable. Don’t think England was going around thinking it was wrong.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It was a very popular civil movement and governments were essentially forced to act.

        the petition in 1814 got 1,375,000 signatures.

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            In 1972, 400,000 british people (of 6 million at the time) gave up sugar to boycott slavery. Seventy years later, mill workers of Manchester supported embargo of Confederacy during US civil war by refusing to handle cotton picked by enslaved people. This came at a hefty personal cost as their way of making living depended on it. Abraham Lincoln later acknowledged this show of support. There’s statue of him in Manchester.

            The British abolishment movement was so popular that they had more signatures demanding the end of slavery than the total amount of votes in the last election. Later, at it’s peak, something like 25% of the entire British naval budget went towards capturing and freeing slave ships.

      • enbipanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve not researched this, but I’ve heard it’s because mouth health is prioritised over aesthetics.

        That basically means: no whitening.

        Teeth are naturally yellowish

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          also, dentistry is more accessible in the UK; free treatment is available to a bigger chunk of the population, and private dental care is cheaper as well.

          So, in terms of severe complications stemming from lack of dental care, the US is worse, but the obsession with straightening & whitening means that people who have got it together enough to appear in the media generally have superficially nicer teeth.

          It’s like most things in America - if you’re doing ok then it’s great, and if you’re not then the rest of the country just pretends you don’t exist.

          • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s like most things in America - if you’re doing ok then it’s great, and if you’re not then the rest of the country just pretends you don’t exist.

            That truly is the US in a nutshell. The US is fantastic if you are in the top 20% (and you have zero empathy for people you don’t know), otherwise this country sucks.

            • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Socialised healthcare means they work and you aren’t left in pain. If you want them to look pretty go and fork out for private treatment.

      • don@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’ve heard that myth before, never see any evidence in favor of it, not that I can be arsed to look.

  • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Sorry, if im smoking crack I strip down to my undies and cover my self in butter. That’s just the way it is.

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ok so here’s the thing: If America lost the war, America would likely be akin to Australia. The UK used it’s North American colonies like they did Australia (that is, a place to transport convicts) so you’d basically be like Australia in that regard. You’d likely be like…cold weather Aussies.

    Also:

    • Australia would be…different? Maybe Dutch?
    • We might not have had a French Revolution, or it may have been different, because a lot of the ideas from the American Revolution inspired the French Revolution.
    • Since the French Revolution have rise to the idea of the modern nation state and Napoleon, we’d not have a lot of countries.
      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        looks at Canadians

        you mean i could have socialized healthcare, weed, and california weather? FUCK YOU BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH YOU SHOULD HAVE TRAITORED HARDER

    • Sergio@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      a lot of the ideas from the American Revolution inspired the French Revolution.

      Since the French Revolution have rise to the idea of the modern nation state and Napoleon, we’d not have a lot of countries.

      At first I was like: wtf? Then I remembered we’re in the shitposting community

      • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean, am I wrong? France bankrupted itself in the war and in funding the American revolution. The American Revolution produced and popularised a lot of ideas that found their way to France and inspired ideas in the French Revolution (as well as a rebellion in Scotland but let’s not get ahead of ourselves).

        The French Revolution gave rise to the idea of the Modern Nation State and Napoleon’s invasions of places like Italy and Germany implanted this idea in those places which eventually lead to the Nationalist revolutions in Germany and Italy in the 19th century.

        If the American revolution failed, we’d might not have the French Revolution we know of today. If that is the case, there’s no rise of the Nation State and no Napoleon to spread it, ergo, no Germany or Italy, as well as a lot of other countries.

        • Sergio@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          This isn’t really my area, but afaik…

          • the French bankrupted themselves for a number of reasons, one of which was indeed the global Ango-French War (which resulted in the creation of the USA) and the earlier Seven Years War. This wasn’t the only cause of the French Revolution.
          • the American and French Revolutions were both products of “the Englightenment” which took part in Europe. To their credit, several of the American leaders saw the value in it and adopted those ideas, but America was pretty much a backwater at that time. Of course American independence was a topic of discussion, much in the same way that the war in Ukraine is today. No doubt some people were “inspired by” the distant foreign war, as an example of ideas that had developed locally.
          • I think the 1648 treaties of Westphalia are generally considered the beginning of modern nation states. I think it’d be tough to argue that German and Italian nationalism were “implanted” by the French Revolution.

          I had a brilliant concluding paragraph but I accidentally deleted it. Something about how this period of history has many relevant lessons about balancing domestic vs international policy, updating antiquated systems of economic and representation systems, and the interplay between popular movements and individual leaders. But this is, after all, a shitposting community, so no great loss.