• Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Yes it would burn, no it would not have much if any affect.
    They burn large amounts of pot all the time and the smoke raises into the atmosphere and falls over a wide area.

  • bender223@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    this is the best plan for world peace I’ve seen so far. aint nobody else got any better ideas 🤷‍♂️

    • CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I leave the vicinity whenever I smell it. Our world is turning into a druggie-topia and I don’t wanna be here for it.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Okay, but 119,000,000 lbs is no small feat to get into the atmosphere

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The plant grows pretty quickly as I understand it, and pulls CO2 from the atmosphere as it does so, using the carbon in its structure, and releasing the oxygen. This carbon will bond with oxygen from the air as it burns high in the atmosphere, so there’s probably no net release beyond what is needed in the process of growing the plants, making the blocks, transporting them to altitude, and feeding everyone who gets the munchies afterwards, but it would “move” the CO2 higher up. I’ve no idea what the implications of that are.

    • MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Ooh, it’s shitty math time!

      Alright, so let’s assume it’s seven 17-ton bricks with an average THC of 20% - that’s what most legal states use to decide flower/concentrate equivalencies, and it’s easy to work with.

      According to Google, burning one ton of industrial hemp produces 1.6 tons of CO2. Let’s assume that this industrial hemp contains no THC, and is fully converted into CO2 when it burns.

      For fun, let’s also calculate how much THC comes out the other end of this. In the plant, THC forms as non-psychoactive THCa, which breaks down into psychoactive THC. In the process, it gets about 12% lighter.

      So, seven 17-ton bricks of weed start out as about 24 tons of THCa and 95 tons of industrial hemp equivalent. When burned, this would become about 152 tons of CO2, but only 21 tons of THC.

        • MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          …Sort of?

          Ngl, I checked the AI answer hoping that it would be wrong when I started opening links. Unfortunately, the first handful of actual search results all gave about the same number.

          Mostly though, I just meant “I checked like three websites that Google brought me to, but I’m not going to bother listing them” :P

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  I interpreted that to mean that they checked the AI answer that google sticks at the top of every search, which is unfortunately best practice if you’re not tech-savvy enough to use DDG + a pile of Firefox extensions to help filter out the mass produced slop websites.

                  What with the absolute hamstringing of search engines, going to the sources of the AI suggested answer is often the only way to get directly relevant information to your question out of google. It’s for sure slopper behavior to just accept the answer without checking, but that didn’t sound like what happened. Maybe I’m just projecting my own behavior onto them, though.