• toast@retrolemmy.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Foothills…epidemic…cyber frontline

    Must be serious – you don’t mix this many metaphors under normal circumstances.

  • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    People seem to be able to reversed engineer almost anything with AI now, so the notion that “proprietary code is secure code” is becoming obsolete. Major hacks like this are going to be more common with anything on a network.

  • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mean, it’s kinda obvious. But it’s also not a bad thing. No secure system will be affected, because secure systems are designed to be impossible to fail.

    Lots of “secure” systems designed by hacks that took money selling half-cocked nonsense to dumb people will fail, and it’ll probably be revealed there’s trillions of dollars of investment by these dumb people into insecure systems that should outrage everyone.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      There are literally thousands of water infrastructure facilities that are on Shodan now. I take your meaning, but it’s a very bad thing.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        42 minutes ago

        Exactly my point. Corruption, stupidity, and complacency allowed that to happen despite experts warning for years it was a terrible idea. This isn’t some new threat, the only ‘new’ part of it is democratization of otherwise arcane knowledge. This is like getting mad that a thermite recipe is being passed around. Yeah, some people will do bad things with it, but generally anything that needs to be secure should be built to be secure against it.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        Implanted medical devices require pretty much skin to skin contact to adjust, the few that do use bluetooth to adjust settings. But yes, it is terrible that we use wireless technology in medical implants. We should, you know, sue the companies that made them knowing they were using naturally vulnerable technology to make them.

        • T. Hex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          the few that do use bluetooth to adjust settings.

          That may be the intended use, but it does not imply the system is secure.

          Here’s an example of an insulin pump vulnerability from a few years ago that enabled attacks from up to six meters away. Think about how many potentially-compromised devices you’re ever within six meters of. The vulnerability enabled remote control over the insulin pump, which IIUC can be deadly.

          https://www.aha.org/h-isac-reports/2021-11-29-h-isac-tlp-white-vulnerability-report-researchers-identify-high-severity

          My point being — it’s not a good thing to be in the midst of a hacking epidemic! Real people will be harmed as a result of increased hacking.

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    This was inevitable with people connecting things to the internet for convenience instead of security.

    • ɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      The funniest thing about this is that there’s no way a human can keep up with this increase in cybersecurity flaws and vulnerabilities that are being discovered, but at the same time, there is no parity between cybersecurity defense and attack.

      Regardless of efforts, we’re still going to be in a losing battle for quite a while.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      38 minutes ago

      They already do. The cheap devices are cheap because their manufacturing cost is subsidized by the ads they show and the data they collect.